Open access | Peer reviewed/Research article | Published online: October 2021 |
Mutual benefit and status quo processes as governance mechanisms in partnerships between organisations that belong to different sectors and organisational models
Victoria Taras
Vol 54(2), pp. 17-30
https://doi.org/10.61869/MSMR6070
How to cite this article: Taras, V. (2021). Mutual benefit and status quo processes as governance mechanisms in partnerships between organisations that belong to different sectors and organisational models. Journal of Co-operative Studies, 54(2), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.61869/MSMR6070
Abstract
Co-operatives are member-owned organisations that follow a set of Co-operative Principles. When they partner with non-co-operative organisations, they risk compromising those principles. However, when partner organisations share those principles in their approaches or aspirations, the partnership generates mutual benefit. Mutual benefit can act as a governance mechanism for the partnership; it promotes co-operation and co-ordination by bringing partners together, maintaining a cohesive strategic direction, and promoting a common vision of the future. Concern for the community, for example, is a co-operative principle but it is also a typical approach among non-co-operatives and the alignment can support the partnership. Close alignment generates a high level of mutual benefit, while broad alignment generates a low level and therefore acts as a weaker mechanism. This article examines the role of mutual benefit in partnerships between the healthcare co-operative Saskatoon Community Clinic (SCC) and several University of Saskatchewan colleges, schools, departments, and divisions. Through these partnerships, the SCC hosts healthcare clinics, specialist healthcare services, and student placements, and generates research. In these cases, co-operation and co-ordination are either supported by a high level of mutual benefit, rely on an available status quo procedure, or are minimised by low interdependence between partners.
References
Bapna, R., Barua, A., Mani, D., & Mehra, A. (2010). Cooperation, coordination, and governance in multisourcing: An agenda for analytical and empirical research. Information Systems Research, 21(4),785-795. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0328
Bevir, M. (2009). Interdependence. In Key Concepts in Governance (pp. 115-117). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446214817.n24
Bevir, M. (2012). Governance: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199606412.001.0001
Brandsen, T., van de Donk, W., & Putters, K. (2005). Griffins or chameleons? Hybridity as a permanent and inevitable characteristic of the third sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(9-10), 749-765. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-200067320
Burbage, L., Gonzalez, E., Dunning, L., Simon, P., & Kuo, T. (2014). Building mutually beneficial partnerships to improve physical activity opportunities through shared-use efforts in under-resourced communities in Los Angeles County. Preventive Medicine, 67(S1), S4-S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.01.001
Canadian Association of Community Health Centres (n.d.). About community health centres. https://www. cachc.ca/about-chcs/
Choi, T., & Robertson, P. J. (2019). Contributors and free-riders in collaborative governance: a computational exploration of social motivation and its effects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(3), 394-413. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy068
Crozier, M. (2008). Listening, learning, steering: New governance, communication and interactive policy formation. Policy & Politics, 36(1), 3-19.
https://doi.org/10.1332/030557308783431616
Davis, M. D., & Brams, S. J. (2021, January 24). Game Theory. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/game-theory
Domingo-Ferrer, J., Martínez, S., Sánchez, D., & Soria-Comas, J. (2017). Co-Utility: Self-enforcing protocols for the mutual benefit of participants. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 59, 148-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2016.12.023
Edgar, L., Marshall, C., & Bassett, M. (2006). Partnerships: Putting good governance principles in practice (IOG 2006-54045). Institute on Governance.
Grandori, A. (1997). Governance structures, coordination mechanisms and cognitive models. Journal of Management and Governance, 1, 29-47.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009977627870
Gruending, D. (1974). The First Ten Years. Community Health Services (Saskatoon) Association. http://www.saskatooncommunityclinic.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/the-first-ten-years.pdf
Institute on Governance (2021). What is Governance? Good governance draws on four key dimensions. https://iog.ca/about-us/our-governance-approach/
International Co-operative Alliance. (2018). Co-operative identity, values and principles. http://ica.coop/en/whats-co-op/co-operative-identity-values-principles
Kleinwächter, W. (2006). Internet Co-Governance: Towards a multilayer multiplayer mechanism of consultation, coordination and cooperation (M3C3). E Learning and Digital Media, 3(3), 473-487. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2006.3.3.473
Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.137
Radinsky, J., Bouillion, L., Lento, E. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Mutual benefit partnership: A curricular design for authenticity. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(4), 405-430.
https://doi.org/10.1080/002202701300200902
Raeymaeckers, P., Vermeiren, C., Noël, C., Van Puyvelde, S., & Willems, J. (2017). The governance of public-nonprofit service networks: A comparison between three types of governance roles. Voluntas, 31(5), 1037-1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9920-7
Rands, S. (2012). Privilege and policy: A history of community clinics in Canada. Revised edition (G. P. Marchildon & C. Levington-Reid, Eds). Canadian Plains Research Centre/University of Regina (Original work published 1994).
Saskatchewan Council for Archives and Archivists. (n.d.). 1962: The College of Medicine and the "Doctors' Strike". http://digital.scaa.sk.ca/gallery/uofs_events/articles/1962.php
Sugden, R. (2015). Team reasoning and intentional cooperation for mutual benefit. Journal of Social Ontology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2014-0006
Sugden, R. (2016). On David Gauthier's theories of coordination and cooperation. Dialogue, 55(4), 713-737. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217316000494
U15 Group of Canadian Research Universities (n.d.). About us/Our members. http://u15.ca/our-members
University of Saskatchewan. (2021). Student headcount and demographics. https://leadership.usask.ca/priorities/reports/enrolment.php
University of Saskatchewan/College of Dentistry (n.d.) Saskatoon West Dental Clinic. https://dentistry.usask.ca/dental-clinics/saskatoon_west_dental_clinic.php
Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books.