Open accesscreativecommonsPeer reviewed/Research article
Published online: October 2021

Mutual benefit and status quo processes as governance mechanisms in partnerships between organisations that belong to different sectors and organisational models

Victoria Taras

Vol 54(2), pp. 17-30

https://doi.org/10.61869/MSMR6070

How to cite this article: Taras, V. (2021). Mutual benefit and status quo processes as governance mechanisms in partnerships between organisations that belong to different sectors and organisational models. Journal of Co-operative Studies, 54(2), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.61869/MSMR6070

Abstract

Co-operatives are member-owned organisations that follow a set of Co-operative Principles. When they partner with non-co-operative organisations, they risk compromising those principles. However, when partner organisations share those principles in their approaches or aspirations, the partnership generates mutual benefit. Mutual benefit can act as a governance mechanism for the partnership; it promotes co-operation and co-ordination by bringing partners together, maintaining a cohesive strategic direction, and promoting a common vision of the future. Concern for the community, for example, is a co-operative principle but it is also a typical approach among non-co-operatives and the alignment can support the partnership. Close alignment generates a high level of mutual benefit, while broad alignment generates a low level and therefore acts as a weaker mechanism. This article examines the role of mutual benefit in partnerships between the healthcare co-operative Saskatoon Community Clinic (SCC) and several University of Saskatchewan colleges, schools, departments, and divisions. Through these partnerships, the SCC hosts healthcare clinics, specialist healthcare services, and student placements, and generates research. In these cases, co-operation and co-ordination are either supported by a high level of mutual benefit, rely on an available status quo procedure, or are minimised by low interdependence between partners.


PDF

References

Bapna, R., Barua, A., Mani, D., & Mehra, A. (2010). Cooperation, coordination, and governance in multisourcing: An agenda for analytical and empirical research. Information Systems Research, 21(4),785-795. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0328

Bevir, M. (2009). Interdependence. In Key Concepts in Governance (pp. 115-117). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446214817.n24

Bevir, M. (2012). Governance: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199606412.001.0001

Brandsen, T., van de Donk, W., & Putters, K. (2005). Griffins or chameleons? Hybridity as a permanent and inevitable characteristic of the third sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(9-10), 749-765. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-200067320

Burbage, L., Gonzalez, E., Dunning, L., Simon, P., & Kuo, T. (2014). Building mutually beneficial partnerships to improve physical activity opportunities through shared-use efforts in under-resourced communities in Los Angeles County. Preventive Medicine, 67(S1), S4-S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.01.001

Canadian Association of Community Health Centres (n.d.). About community health centres. https://www. cachc.ca/about-chcs/

Choi, T., & Robertson, P. J. (2019). Contributors and free-riders in collaborative governance: a computational exploration of social motivation and its effects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(3), 394-413. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy068

Crozier, M. (2008). Listening, learning, steering: New governance, communication and interactive policy formation. Policy & Politics, 36(1), 3-19.
https://doi.org/10.1332/030557308783431616

Davis, M. D., & Brams, S. J. (2021, January 24). Game Theory. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/game-theory

Domingo-Ferrer, J., Martínez, S., Sánchez, D., & Soria-Comas, J. (2017). Co-Utility: Self-enforcing protocols for the mutual benefit of participants. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 59, 148-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2016.12.023

Edgar, L., Marshall, C., & Bassett, M. (2006). Partnerships: Putting good governance principles in practice (IOG 2006-54045). Institute on Governance.

Grandori, A. (1997). Governance structures, coordination mechanisms and cognitive models. Journal of Management and Governance, 1, 29-47.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009977627870

Gruending, D. (1974). The First Ten Years. Community Health Services (Saskatoon) Association. http://www.saskatooncommunityclinic.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/the-first-ten-years.pdf

Institute on Governance (2021). What is Governance? Good governance draws on four key dimensions. https://iog.ca/about-us/our-governance-approach/

International Co-operative Alliance. (2018). Co-operative identity, values and principles. http://ica.coop/en/whats-co-op/co-operative-identity-values-principles

Kleinwächter, W. (2006). Internet Co-Governance: Towards a multilayer multiplayer mechanism of consultation, coordination and cooperation (M3C3). E Learning and Digital Media, 3(3), 473-487. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2006.3.3.473

Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.137

Radinsky, J., Bouillion, L., Lento, E. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Mutual benefit partnership: A curricular design for authenticity. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(4), 405-430.
https://doi.org/10.1080/002202701300200902

Raeymaeckers, P., Vermeiren, C., Noël, C., Van Puyvelde, S., & Willems, J. (2017). The governance of public-nonprofit service networks: A comparison between three types of governance roles. Voluntas, 31(5), 1037-1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9920-7

Rands, S. (2012). Privilege and policy: A history of community clinics in Canada. Revised edition (G. P. Marchildon & C. Levington-Reid, Eds). Canadian Plains Research Centre/University of Regina (Original work published 1994).

Saskatchewan Council for Archives and Archivists. (n.d.). 1962: The College of Medicine and the "Doctors' Strike". http://digital.scaa.sk.ca/gallery/uofs_events/articles/1962.php

Sugden, R. (2015). Team reasoning and intentional cooperation for mutual benefit. Journal of Social Ontology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2014-0006

Sugden, R. (2016). On David Gauthier's theories of coordination and cooperation. Dialogue, 55(4), 713-737. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217316000494

U15 Group of Canadian Research Universities (n.d.). About us/Our members. http://u15.ca/our-members

University of Saskatchewan. (2021). Student headcount and demographics. https://leadership.usask.ca/priorities/reports/enrolment.php

University of Saskatchewan/College of Dentistry (n.d.) Saskatoon West Dental Clinic. https://dentistry.usask.ca/dental-clinics/saskatoon_west_dental_clinic.php

Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books.

UK Society for Co-operative Studies is registered in England and Wales as a charitable incorporated organisation Number 1175295. Our registered office is Holyoake House, Hanover Street, Manchester, M60 0AS.
Log in | Powered by White Fuse